Facebook Videos vs YouTube Links: Which Gets Higher Engagement?
As you know, Page admins have two options when posting videos: to either upload them from computers natively via Facebook or to post a link to your videos on YouTube. According to our study, most page admins choose to do the latter. They posted 3 684 YouTube links compared to 458 Facebook videos towards the end of January (from January 22nd to January 27th 2013).
Videos Are Usually Liked, not Shared
Although YouTube links have been posted about 8 times more than Facebook videos, it’s surprising to see that both of these options generated a similar number of Likes, Comments and Shares, as you can see in the graph below. Also notice that Likes were the most frequent type of interaction (not Shares) and that Facebook videos generated double the amount of Comments that YouTube links did. Why do you think this is the case? Let us know in the comments section below!
And What About Engagement?
To our surprise, Facebook videos achieved a 40% higher Engagement Rate (0,25%) than YouTube links (0,151%) in the studied period. But there are a number of advantages whichever path you choose.
The Benefits of YouTube Links
- YouTube is the most popular video-sharing website that can aggregate, not only your videos, but also data concerning its views and shares. Facebook Insights won´t tell you how many times your video has been viewed, which is a huge disadvantage.
- You can share the YouTube link anywhere that supports your online exposure, unlike Facebook videos which cannot be shared outside of the social network.
The Benefits of Facebook Videos
- Your Facebook fans can be tagged in the video.
- Your Facebook videos suggest that users Like your Page via a button directly in the video.
Which option do you prefer and why? Are Facebook videos suitable for the needs of businesses or are they intended for casual, personal rather than for content creators?
Also check out if shortened URL links work better than the longer ones on Facebook in on our study here!